Toolbox
Evaluation criteria for internal review of ERA-NET participation
Evaluation criteria
The member organisations of the TAFTIE Working Group on ERA-NETs have shared best practice to compile and recommend the following global List of Criteria for ERA-NET Evaluation.
The criteria are divided into two categories:
- Network
- Output
NETWORK |
|
|
Complementarity to other funding instruments (FP7, EUROSTARS, national, regional, bilateral, etc) |
||
Potential national added value |
||
|
Critical mass of potential clients (dep. on topic and preferred countries for cooperation) |
|
|
Need for international network |
|
Long-term perspective |
||
|
Maturity of network |
|
|
Sustainability of network |
|
|
Suitability of the ERA NET instrument in a specific area |
|
Commitment |
||
|
Own |
|
|
|
- Budgetary commitment of national programme owner (ministry or agency) |
|
|
- Enthusiasm of agency |
|
|
- Quality of performance |
|
Others |
|
|
|
- Budgetary commitments of national programme owners (ministries or agencies) |
|
|
- Enthusiasm of ERA NET partners |
|
|
- Quality of performance |
|
Coordinator (incl. overall performance) |
|
Consortium (composition) |
||
|
Appropriate countries (in sense of competence, competition or collaboration) |
|
|
Relevant programmes available |
|
Joint Calls |
||
|
Efficiency |
|
|
Room for national acceptance of Joint Call decision processes |
|
|
Interaction with other networks (other ERA NETs, EUREKA, ETPs) |
|
TOTAL SCORE - NETWORK (max = 7) |
||
OUTPUT |
|
|
Calls |
||
|
Real output versus expected output |
|
|
|
- Response of target group |
|
|
- Client satisfaction with calls |
|
Minimum output reached (each agency defines own minimum) |
|
Other activities in the ERA NET (e.g. training, technology transfer, other support measures, etc) |
||
|
Agency satisfaction with activities |
|
|
Client satisfaction with activities |
|
Learning effects |
||
|
Impact on internal programme design |
|
|
Impact measurement strategy |
|
Cost-benefit ratio |
||
|
Total overhead in joint calls compared to overhead for similar national/international projects |
|
|
Return from effort required by staff to run the ERA NET meets agency's expectations |
|
TOTAL SCORE - OUTPUT (max = 5) |
||
